A definitive efficiency hack says no.
Not accomplishing something will forever be quicker than getting it done. This assertion helps me to remember the old PC programming saying, "Recollect that there is no code quicker than no code."
A similar way of thinking applies in different everyday issues. For instance, there is no gathering that goes quicker than not having a gathering by any means.
This isn't to say you ought to never go to another gathering, however truly we accept numerous things we would really prefer not to do. There are numerous gatherings held that don't should be held. There is a ton of code composed that could be erased.
How regularly individuals request that you accomplish something and you simply answer, "Of course." after three days, you're overpowered by how much is on your plan for the day. We become baffled by our commitments despite the fact that we were the ones who accepted them in any case.
It merits inquiring as to whether things are important. Large numbers of them are not, and a straightforward "no" will be more useful than whatever work the most productive individual can assemble.
However, assuming the advantages of saying no are so self-evident, why do we say OK so frequently?
Comments